Dataset Information

Clinical validation of a blood-based classifier for diagnostic evaluation of asymptomatic individuals with pulmonary nodules.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The number of pulmonary nodules detected in the US is expected to increase substantially following recent recommendations for nationwide CT-based lung cancer screening. Given the low specificity of CT screening, non-invasive adjuvant methods are needed to differentiate cancerous lesions from benign nodules to help avoid unnecessary invasive procedures in the asymptomatic population. We have constructed a serum-based multi-biomarker panel and assessed its clinical accuracy in a retrospective analysis of samples collected from participants with suspicious radiographic findings in the Prostate, Lung, Chest and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial.

Methods

Starting with a set of 9 candidate biomarkers, we identified 8 that exhibited limited pre-analytical variability with increasing clotting time, a key pre-analytical variable associated with the collection of serum. These 8 biomarkers were evaluated in a training study consisting of 95 stage I NSCLC patients and 186 smoker controls where a 5-biomarker pulmonary nodule classifier (PNC) was selected. The clinical accuracy of the PNC was determined in a blinded study of asymptomatic individuals comprising 119 confirmed malignant nodule cases and 119 benign nodule controls selected from the PLCO screening trial.

Results

A PNC comprising 5 biomarkers: CEA, CYFRA 21-1, OPN, SCC, and TFPI, was selected in the training study. In an independent validation study, the PNC resolved lung cancer cases from benign nodule controls with an AUC of 0.653 (p < 0.0001). CEA and CYFRA 21-1, two of the markers included in the PNC, also accurately distinguished malignant lesions from benign controls.

Conclusions

A 5-biomarker blood test has been developed for the diagnostic evaluation of asymptomatic individuals with solitary pulmonary nodules.

SUBMITTER: Birse CE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5498919 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Despite tremendous efforts by the international research community to understand the pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the reasons behind the clinical variability, ranging from asymptomatic infection to lethal disease, are still unclear. Existing inter-individual variations of the immune responses, due to environmental exposures and genetic factors, may be critical to the development or not of symptomatic disease after infection with SARS-CoV-2, and transcriptomic differences marking such responses may be observed even later, after convalescence. Herein, we performed genome-wide transcriptional whole-blood profiling to test the hypothesis that immune response-related gene signatures may differ between healthy individuals with prior entirely asymptomatic versus clinical SARS-CoV-2 infection, all of which developed an equally robust antibody response. Among 12.789 protein-coding genes analyzed, there were only six and nine genes with significantly decreased or increased expression, respectively, in those with prior asymptomatic infection (n=17, mean age 34 years) relatively to those with clinical infection (n=15, mean age 37 years). All six genes with decreased expression (IFIT3, IFI44L, RSAD2, FOLR3, PI3, ALOX15), are involved in innate immune response while the first two are interferon-induced proteins. Among genes with increased expression six are involved in immune response (GZMH, CLEC1B, CLEC12A), viral mRNA translation (GCAT), energy metabolism (CACNA2D2) and oxidative stress response (ENC1). Notably, 8/15 differentially expressed genes are regulated by interferons. Our results suggest that an intrinsically weaker expression of some innate immunityrelated genes may be associated with an asymptomatic disease course in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Whether a certain gene signature predicts, or not, those who will develop a more efficient immune response upon exposure to SARS-CoV-2, with implications for prioritization for vaccination, warrant further study.

Project description:BackgroundThe identification of indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) following a low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is a major challenge for early diagnosis of lung cancer. The inadequate assessment of IPNs' malignancy risk results in a large number of unnecessary surgeries or an increased risk of cancer metastases. However, limited studies on non-invasive diagnosis of IPNs have been reported.MethodsIn this study, we identified and evaluated the diagnostic value of circulating small extracellular vesicle (sEV) microRNAs (miRNAs) in patients with IPNs that had been newly detected using LDCT scanning and were scheduled for surgery. Out of 459 recruited patients, 109 eligible patients with IPNs were enrolled in the training cohort (n = 47) and the test cohort (n = 62). An external cohort (n = 99) was used for validation. MiRNAs were extracted from plasma sEVs, and assessed using Small RNA sequencing. 490 lung adenocarcinoma samples and follow-up data were used to investigate the role of miRNAs in overall survival.ResultsA circulating sEV miRNA (CirsEV-miR) model was constructed from five differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs), showing 0.920 AUC in the training cohort (n = 47), and further identified in the test cohort (n = 62) and in an external validation cohort (n = 99). Among five DEMs of the CirsEV-miR model, miR-101-3p and miR-150-5p were significantly associated with better overall survival (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0069). The CirsEV-miR scores were calculated, which significantly correlated with IPNs diameters (p < 0.05), and were able to discriminate between benign and malignant PNs (diameter ≤ 1 cm). The expression patterns of sEV miRNAs in the benign, adenocarcinoma in situ/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, and invasive adenocarcinoma subgroups were found to gradually change with the increase in aggressiveness for the first time. Among all DEMs of the three subgroups, five miRNAs (miR-30c-5p, miR-30e-5p, miR-500a-3p, miR-125a-5p, and miR-99a-5p) were also significantly associated with overall survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients.ConclusionsOur results indicate that the CirsEV-miR model could help distinguish between benign and malignant PNs, providing insights into the feasibility of circulating sEV miRNAs in diagnostic biomarker development.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trials: ChiCTR1800019877. Registered 05 December 2018, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=31346 .

Project description:BackgroundBronchoscopy is a common procedure used for evaluation of suspicious lung nodules, but the low diagnostic sensitivity of bronchoscopy often results in inconclusive results and delays in treatment. Percepta Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) was developed to assist with patient management in cases where bronchoscopy is inconclusive. Studies have shown that exposure to tobacco smoke alters gene expression in airway epithelial cells in a way that indicates an increased risk of developing lung cancer. Percepta GSC leverages this idea of a molecular "field of injury" from smoking and was developed using RNA sequencing data generated from lung bronchial brushings of the upper airway. A Percepta GSC score is calculated from an ensemble of machine learning algorithms utilizing clinical and genomic features and is used to refine a patient's risk stratification.MethodsThe objective of the analysis described and reported here is to validate the analytical performance of Percepta GSC. Analytical performance studies characterized the sensitivity of Percepta GSC test results to input RNA quantity, the potentially interfering agents of blood and genomic DNA, and the reproducibility of test results within and between processing runs and between laboratories.ResultsVarying the amount of input RNA into the assay across a nominal range had no significant impact on Percepta GSC classifier results. Bronchial brushing RNA contaminated with up to 10% genomic DNA by nucleic acid mass also showed no significant difference on classifier results. The addition of blood RNA, a potential contaminant in the bronchial brushing sample, caused no change to classifier results at up to 11% contamination by RNA proportion. Percepta GSC scores were reproducible between runs, within runs, and between laboratories, varying within less than 4% of the total score range (standard deviation of 0.169 for scores on 4.57 scale).ConclusionsThe analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity, and reproducibility of Percepta GSC laboratory results were successfully demonstrated under conditions of expected day to day variation in testing. Percepta GSC test results are analytically robust and suitable for routine clinical use.