Dataset Information

Low-Tube-Voltage CT Urography Using Low-Concentration-Iodine Contrast Media and Iterative Reconstruction: A Multi-Institutional Randomized Controlled Trial for Comparison with Conventional CT Urography.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To compare the image quality of low-tube-voltage and low-iodine-concentration-contrast-medium (LVLC) computed tomography urography (CTU) with iterative reconstruction (IR) with that of conventional CTU.

Materials and methods

This prospective, multi-institutional, randomized controlled trial was performed at 16 hospitals using CT scanners from various vendors. Patients were randomly assigned to the following groups: 1) the LVLC-CTU (80 kVp and 240 mgI/mL) with IR group and 2) the conventional CTU (120 kVp and 350 mgI/mL) with filtered-back projection group. The overall diagnostic acceptability, sharpness, and noise were assessed. Additionally, the mean attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and figure of merit (FOM) in the urinary tract were evaluated.

Results

The study included 299 patients (LVLC-CTU group: 150 patients; conventional CTU group: 149 patients). The LVLC-CTU group had a significantly lower effective radiation dose (5.73 ± 4.04 vs. 8.43 ± 4.38 mSv) compared to the conventional CTU group. LVLC-CTU showed at least standard diagnostic acceptability (score ≥ 3), but it was non-inferior when compared to conventional CTU. The mean attenuation value, mean SNR, CNR, and FOM in all pre-defined segments of the urinary tract were significantly higher in the LVLC-CTU group than in the conventional CTU group.

Conclusion

The diagnostic acceptability and quantitative image quality of LVLC-CTU with IR are not inferior to those of conventional CTU. Additionally, LVLC-CTU with IR is beneficial because both radiation exposure and total iodine load are reduced.

SUBMITTER: Kim SY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6201985 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance and image quality of the low-tube voltage and low-contrast medium dose protocol for hepatic dynamic CT.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted between January and May 2018. All patients underwent hepatic dynamic CT using one of the two protocols: tube voltage, 80 kVp and contrast dose, 370 mgI/kg with hybrid iterative reconstruction or tube voltage, 120 kVp and contrast dose, 600 mgI/kg with filtered back projection. Two radiologists independently scored lesion conspicuity and image quality. Another radiologist measured the CT numbers of abdominal organs, muscles, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in each phase. Lesion detectability, HCC diagnostic ability, and image quality of the arterial phase were compared between the two protocols using the non-inferiority test. CT numbers and HCC-to-liver contrast were compared between the protocols using the Mann-Whitney U test.Results424 patients (70.5 ± 10.1 years) were evaluated. The 80-kVp protocol showed non-inferiority in lesion detectability and diagnostic ability for HCC (sensitivity, 85.7-89.3%; specificity, 96.3-98.6%) compared with the 120-kVp protocol (sensitivity, 91.0-93.3%; specificity, 93.6-97.3%) (p < 0.001-0.038). The ratio of fair image quality in the 80-kVp protocol also showed non-inferiority compared with that in the 120-kVp protocol in assessments by both readers (p < 0.001). HCC-to-liver contrast showed no significant differences for all phases (p = 0.309-0.705) between the two protocols.ConclusionThe 80-kVp protocol with hybrid iterative reconstruction for hepatic dynamic CT can decrease iodine doses while maintaining diagnostic performance and image quality compared with the 120-kVp protocol.Advances in knowledgeThe 80- and 120-kVp protocols showed equivalent hepatic lesion detectability, diagnostic ability for HCC, image quality, and HCC-to-liver contrast.The 80-kVp protocol showed a 38.3% reduction in iodine dose compared with the 120-kVp protocol.

Project description:PurposeTo determine the impact of low tube voltage coronary CT angiography on detection of subclinical atherosclerosis.Materials and methodsRetrospective sampling of an emergency department coronary CT angiography registry was performed. All patients in the registry underwent a noncontrast coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring scan at 120 kV before coronary CT angiography. The study sample (n = 264) constituted patients with subclinical atherosclerosis (Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System™ [CAD-RADS] 1 or 2) randomly mixed one-to-one with patients without atherosclerosis (CAD-RADS 0). The patients with coronary CT angiography performed at 70-90 kV were considered the low tube voltage group (n = 159) and patients with coronary CT angiography performed at 100-120 kV were considered the standard tube voltage group (n = 105). The number of coronary plaques and overall CAD-RADS classification (per patient) were evaluated twice: initially, by reading coronary CT angiography alone, and then, by coronary CT angiography in combination with a CAC scan. Considering the combined reading (CT angiography plus CAC scan) as the reference standard, the performance of coronary CT angiography alone was assessed for plaque detection and appropriate CAD-RADS (per patient) classification. The comparisons were made between the low tube voltage and standard tube voltage groups by using a Fisher exact test and χ2 test for proportions and a Mann-Whitney test and Kruskal-Wallis test for means.ResultsIn total, 455 plaques were identified in 118 patients (70 of 159 patients in the low tube voltage group; 48 of 105 in the standard tube voltage group). When reading coronary CT angiographic images alone, 97 of 455 (21%) plaques were missed that led to an incorrect CAD-RADS classification in 16 of 264 (6%) studies (interpreted as CAD-RADS 0 instead of CAD-RADS 1 or 2). Missed plaques were significantly more frequent in the low tube voltage group versus the standard tube voltage group (41% [85 of 206] vs 5% [12 of 249], respectively; P < .001). Incorrect CAD-RADS classification was also seen more commonly in the low tube voltage group (8.8% [14 of 159] vs 2% [two of 105]; P = .01), typically at low plaque burden (median CAC score, 1; range, 1-4). Calcified plaques that appeared isodense to luminal contrast material attenuation were seen more frequently in the low tube voltage group compared with the standard tube voltage group (20% [32 of 159] vs 7.6% [eight of 105], respectively; P = .005).ConclusionCoronary artery plaques may be missed at low tube voltage coronary CT angiographic examination performed without a concomitant CAC scan.© RSNA, 2019Supplemental material is available for this article.See also the commentary by Truong in this issue.

Project description:BackgroundOur aim was to compare CT images from native, nephrographic and excretory phases using image quality criteria as well as the detection of positive pathological findings in CT Urography, to explore if the radiation burden to the younger group of patients or patients with negative outcomes can be reduced.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of 40 patients who underwent a CT Urography examination on a 192-slice dual source scanner. Image quality was assessed for four specific renal image criteria from the European guidelines, together with pathological assessment in three categories: renal, other abdominal, and incidental findings without clinical significance. Each phase was assessed individually by three radiologists with varying experience using a graded scale. Certainty scores were derived based on the graded assessments. Statistical analysis was performed using visual grading regression (VGR). The limit for significance was set at p = 0.05.ResultsFor visual reproduction of the renal parenchyma and renal arteries, the image quality was judged better for the nephrogram phase (p < 0.001), whereas renal pelvis/calyces and proximal ureters were better reproduced in the excretory phase compared to the native phase (p < 0.001). Similarly, significantly higher certainty scores were obtained in the nephrogram phase for renal parenchyma and renal arteries, but in the excretory phase for renal pelvis/calyxes and proximal ureters. Assessment of pathology in the three categories showed no statistically significant differences between the three phases. Certainty scores for assessment of pathology, however, showed a significantly higher certainty for renal pathology when comparing the native phase to nephrogram and excretory phase and a significantly higher score for nephrographic phase but only for incidental findings.ConclusionVisualisation of renal anatomy was as expected with each post-contrast phase showing favourable scores compared to the native phase. No statistically significant differences in the assessment of pathology were found between the three phases. The low-dose CT (LDCT) seems to be sufficient in differentiating between normal and pathological examinations. To reduce the radiation burden in certain patient groups, the LDCT could be considered a suitable alternative as a first line imaging method. However, radiologists should be aware of its limitations.