Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Balancing model-based and memory-free action selection under competitive pressure.


ABSTRACT: In competitive situations, winning depends on selecting actions that surprise the opponent. Such unpredictable action can be generated based on representations of the opponent's strategy and choice history (model-based counter-prediction) or by choosing actions in a memory-free, stochastic manner. Across five different experiments using a variant of a matching-pennies game with simulated and human opponents we found that people toggle between these two strategies, using model-based selection when recent wins signal the appropriateness of the current model, but reverting to stochastic selection following losses. Also, after wins, feedback-related, mid-frontal EEG activity reflected information about the opponent's global and local strategy, and predicted upcoming choices. After losses, this activity was nearly absent-indicating that the internal model is suppressed after negative feedback. We suggest that the mixed-strategy approach allows negotiating two conflicting goals: 1) exploiting the opponent's deviations from randomness while 2) remaining unpredictable for the opponent.

SUBMITTER: Kikumoto A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6812965 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4909129 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2679211 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5919653 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2517234 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4140648 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1462796 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4273436 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3619454 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1569689 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3669370 | biostudies-literature