Dataset Information

Data on the relationship of signal-to-cutoff ratio of two HIV antigen/antibody combination assays to subsequent confirmation of HIV-1 infection in a low-prevalence population.

ABSTRACT: HIV-1/2 antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) immunoassays that detect HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies and HIV-1 p24 antigen are commonly used in the diagnosis of HIV-1/HIV-2 infections in human plasma/serum. Samples from patients with positive screening results require confirmation by antibody differentiation and/or HIV PCR assays. HIV screening assays are commonly reported as positive or negative based on a signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) threshold. For some HIV screening assays, the strength of the S/CO value correlates with likelihood that confirmatory testing will be positive. The data in this article provide results from two HIV Ag/Ab combination assays (Abbott Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo Assay, a 4th generation combination assay; Bio-Rad Bioplex 2200 HIV Ag-Ab Assay, a 5th generation assay). The data include 23,331 HIV screening results, S/CO ratios, antibody differentiation or Western blot results (for samples with positive HIV screens), HIV-1 PCR results (if performed), patient location at time of testing, age, and sex. Distribution of S/CO ratios for the Bio-Rad HIV screening assay data and the distribution of S/CO values for samples with positive screening results were analyzed.

SUBMITTER: Hodgson CK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7243050 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Data on the relationship of signal-to-cutoff ratio of two HIV antigen/antibody combination assays to subsequent confirmation of HIV-1 infection in a low-prevalence population.

Hodgson Christina K CK Krasowski Matthew D MD Ford Bradley A BA

Data in brief 20200516

HIV-1/2 antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) immunoassays that detect HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies and HIV-1 p24 antigen are commonly used in the diagnosis of HIV-1/HIV-2 infections in human plasma/serum. Samples from patients with positive screening results require confirmation by antibody differentiation and/or HIV PCR assays. HIV screening assays are commonly reported as positive or negative based on a signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) threshold. For some HIV screening assays, the strength of the S/CO value correlat ...[more]

PMID: 32462068

Similar Datasets

Project description:Tumor budding in colorectal carcinoma has been associated with poor outcome in multiple studies, but the absence of an established histologic cutoff for "high" tumor budding, heterogeneity in study populations, and varying methods for assessing tumor budding have hindered widespread incorporation of this parameter in clinical reports. We used an established scoring system in a population-based cohort to determine a histologic cutoff for "high" tumor budding and confirm its prognostic significance. We retrieved hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections from 553 incident colorectal carcinoma cases. Each case was previously characterized for select molecular alterations and survival data. Interobserver agreement was assessed between 2 gastrointestinal pathologists and a group of 4 general surgical pathologists. High budding (≥ 10 tumor buds in a ×20 objective field) was present in 32% of cases, low budding in 46%, and no budding in 22%. High tumor budding was associated with advanced pathologic stage (P < 0.001), microsatellite stability (P = 0.005), KRAS mutation (P = 0.010), and on multivariate analysis with a > 2 times risk of cancer-specific death (hazard ratio = 2.57 [1.27, 5.19]). After multivariate adjustment, by penalized smoothing splines, we found increasing tumor bud counts from 5 upward to be associated with an increasingly shortened cancer-specific survival. By this method, a tumor bud count of 10 corresponded to approximately 2.5 times risk of cancer-specific death. The interobserver agreement was good with weighted κ of 0.70 for 2 gastrointestinal pathologists over 121 random cases and 0.72 between all 6 pathologists for 20 random cases. Using an established method to assess budding on routine histologic stains, we have shown that a cutoff of 10 for high tumor budding is independently associated with a significantly worse prognosis. The reproducibility data provide support for the routine widespread implementation of tumor budding in clinical reports.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Two manufacturers, Maxim Biomedical and Sedia Biosciences Corporation, supply CDC-approved versions of the HIV-1 Limiting Antigen Avidity EIA (LAg) for detecting 'recent' HIV infection in cross-sectional incidence estimation. This study assesses and compares the performance of the two assays for incidence surveillance. METHODS:We ran both assays on a panel of 2,500 well-characterized HIV-1-infected specimens. We analysed concordance of assay results, assessed reproducibility using repeat testing and estimated mean durations of recent infection (MDRIs) and false-recent rates (FRRs) for a range of normalized optical density (ODn) thresholds, alone and in combination with viral load thresholds. We defined three hypothetical surveillance scenarios, similar to the Kenyan and South African epidemics, and a concentrated epidemic. These scenarios allowed us to evaluate the precision of incidence estimates obtained by means of various recent infection testing algorithms (RITAs) based on each of the two assays. RESULTS:The Maxim assay produced lower ODn values than the Sedia assay on average, largely as a result of higher calibrator readings (mean OD of 0.749 vs. 0.643), with correlation of normalized readings lower (R2 = 0.908 vs. R2 = 0.938). Reproducibility on blinded control specimens was slightly better for Maxim. The MDRI of a Maxim-based algorithm at the 'standard' threshold (ODn ?1.5 & VL >1,000) was 201 days (95% CI: 180,223) and for Sedia 171 (152,191). The difference Differences in MDRI were estimated at 32.7 (22.9,42.8) and 30.9 days (21.7,40.7) for the two algorithms, respectively. Commensurately, the Maxim algorithm had a higher FRR in treatment-naive subjects (1.7% vs. 1.1%). The two assays produced similar precision of incidence estimates in the three surveillance scenarios. CONCLUSIONS:Differences between the assays can be primarily attributed to the calibrators supplied by the manufacturers. Performance for surveillance was extremely similar, although different thresholds were optimal (i.e. produced the lowest variance of incidence estimates) and at any given ODn threshold, different estimates of MDRI and FRR were obtained. The two assays cannot be treated as interchangeable: assay and algorithm-specific performance characteristic estimates must be used for survey planning and incidence estimation.

Dataset Information

Data on the relationship of signal-to-cutoff ratio of two HIV antigen/antibody combination assays to subsequent confirmation of HIV-1 infection in a low-prevalence population.

Publications

Data on the relationship of signal-to-cutoff ratio of two HIV antigen/antibody combination assays to subsequent confirmation of HIV-1 infection in a low-prevalence population.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure