Dataset Information

Is it necessary for children to receive professional fluoride in addition to regular fluoride toothpaste? Protocol for a systematic review.

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION:Regular toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste is a fundamental intervention for caries prevention. Professional fluoride application (PFA) is widely considered a beneficial supplement to the routine use of fluoride toothpaste. However, some recent studies have failed to demonstrate the preventive effect of PFA. In addition, an increasing number of studies have highlighted the potential adverse effects of fluoride. However, little information exists on the effectiveness of additional PFA. The objective of this review is to systematically analyse the efficacy of PFA in addition to regular fluoride toothpaste among children under the age of 16. METHOD AND ANALYSIS:We will search the PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for randomised controlled trials without language or publication date restrictions. Additional studies will be identified by manually searching the reference lists of the included studies and relevant reviews. At least two authors will carry out the selection of studies independently and in duplicate. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool will be used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. The random effects model will be used for meta-analyses. The data synthesis will be conducted using Review Manager software (RevMan V.5.3). The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation will be used to assess the quality of supporting evidence for each major comparison. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:There is no need for ethical approval. The results of this review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and social networks. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER:CRD42020165270.

SUBMITTER: Yu L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7507841 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Is it necessary for children to receive professional fluoride in addition to regular fluoride toothpaste? Protocol for a systematic review.

Yu Lintong L Yu Xueqian X Li Yueyang Y Li Jun J Hua Fang F Song Guangtai G

BMJ open 20200921 9

<h4>Introduction</h4>Regular toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste is a fundamental intervention for caries prevention. Professional fluoride application (PFA) is widely considered a beneficial supplement to the routine use of fluoride toothpaste. However, some recent studies have failed to demonstrate the preventive effect of PFA. In addition, an increasing number of studies have highlighted the potential adverse effects of fluoride. However, little information exists on the effectiveness of a ...[more]

PMID: 32958490

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundModern toothbrushes origin can be traced to plant-derived chewing sticks, which were documented to be used Babylonians as early as 3500 BC. Chewing sticks are routinely used for cleaning teeth in Asia, Africa, South America, and the Middle East. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the antibacterial effect of miswak herbal toothpaste compared to fluoride toothpaste using a normal toothbrush, against Streptococcus mutans in high caries risk patients.Material and methodsA total of 32 participants were recruited to the current clinical trial using convenience sampling randomly either to miswak or fluoride toothpastes groups (n=16). The bacterial count represented as colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/ml) was assessed at baseline and after 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. Moreover, the ion release for silicone, calcium, phosphorus, and fluoride from both toothpastes was analyzed in addition to the pH of both toothpastes and their supernatants. Intergroup comparison was performed using independent t test, while intragroup comparison was performed using repeated measures ANOVA followed by tukey post-hoc test and paired t test when appropriate.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference between both toothpastes for the S. mutans count within each follow up period, however the bacterial count significantly decreased over time in both groups. Signal Fluoride toothpaste exhibited statistically significant higher ion release when compared to the Dabur Miswak toothpaste. There was no statistically significant difference between either toothpastes regarding pH (P = 0.5368), while comparison between supernatants of toothpastes have shown statistically significant difference (P = 0.0194), with a higher pH in miswak toothpaste.ConclusionsMiswak herbal toothpaste possesses a potent antibacterial effect, yet its remineralization potential is questionable due to its inferior ion release that will affect the ion substantivity in saliva, which is an important factor in remineralization. Key words:High caries risk, Miswak, Fluoride, Antibacterial, Streptococcus mutans.

Project description:BackgroundGingivitis is driven by plaque accumulation and, if left untreated, can progress to irreversible periodontitis. For many, the mechanical action of toothbrushing does not achieve adequate plaque control. The aim of this study was to investigate whether twice-daily use of a toothpaste containing 0.2% high molecular weight (HMW) sodium hyaluronate with 67% sodium bicarbonate and 0.221% sodium fluoride (experimental toothpaste) could improve gingival health compared with a regular fluoride toothpaste (negative control). The study also assessed whether the experimental toothpaste could provide additive gingival health benefit over a toothpaste containing only 67% sodium bicarbonate and 0.221% sodium fluoride (positive control).MethodsThis was a single-center, examiner-blinded, randomized, clinical study in healthy adults with mild-to-moderate gingivitis. At baseline, after abstaining from toothbrushing for 12 h, prospective participants underwent oral soft tissue (OST) and oral hard tissue examination followed by assessments for gingival inflammation (Modified Gingival Index [MGI]), gingival bleeding (Bleeding Index [BI]), and supra-gingival plaque (Turesky Plaque Index [TPI]). Eligible participants were stratified by gender and baseline number of bleeding sites (low: <45; high: ≥45 bleeding sites). Following randomization, participants underwent prophylactic dental treatment. Participants received a full OST examination, MGI, BI and TPI assessments after 3 days, 1, 2 and 6 weeks of product use.ResultsIn total, 110 participants were screened for study entry and all were randomized to receive one of three toothpastes (experimental: sodium hyaluronate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium fluoride; positive control: sodium bicarbonate, sodium fluoride; negative control: regular fluoride toothpaste). For all measures, significant improvements were observed in participants receiving either sodium bicarbonate-containing toothpaste (experimental or positive control) compared with the regular fluoride toothpaste (negative control) at week 6. No significant difference was observed in any assessment or visit comparing the experimental toothpaste with the positive control.ConclusionsBoth the experimental and the positive control toothpastes demonstrated clinically relevant improvements in gingival health compared with a regular fluoride toothpaste (negative control). However, no additional gingival health improvement was observed for the experimental toothpaste compared with the positive control, therefore, no additional gingival health benefit can be attributed to the inclusion of sodium hyaluronate in this formulation.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04737538 (04/02/2021).

Project description:BackgroundThis examiner-blind, stratified, parallel study aimed to evaluate the anti-gingivitis efficacy of a non-aqueous (anhydrous) 0.454% w/w stannous fluoride toothpaste ('Test') versus a sodium monofluorophosphate toothpaste ('Control') in people with clinically-confirmed mild-moderate gingivitis. Plaque-induced gingivitis can progress to irreversible periodontitis if left untreated. This can be controlled by an effective oral hygiene regimen such as one including toothbrushing with a toothpaste containing the chemotherapeutic agent stannous fluoride. Long-term studies over 4-12 weeks have shown the efficacy of stannous fluoride; however, shorter term studies are needed to examine if the effects on measures of gingivitis and plaque control occur sooner.MethodsEligible participants were randomised to 3 weeks' twice-daily brushing (for 1 min) with Test or Control toothpastes. The primary efficacy variable was between-treatment difference in Bleeding Index (BI) at 3 weeks; secondary variables were between-treatment differences in number of bleeding sites, modified Gingival Index (MGI), and Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TPI) at Weeks 2 and 3.ResultsA statistically significant (p < 0.0001) lower BI score was reported for Test (n = 65) versus Control (n = 65) groups at Week 2 (mean difference: - 0.07 [95% CI - 0.9, - 0.05]; 32.7% difference) and Week 3 (mean difference: - 0.06 [95% CI - 0.8, - 0.04]; 29.2% difference). The Test group also demonstrated statistically significant lower (all p < 0.0001 versus Control) number of bleeding sites (Weeks 2/3 mean difference [95% CI]: - 10.04 [- 12.3, - 7.5]/ - 8.2 [- 11.1, - 5.3] sites; 33.0%/29.3% difference); MGI score (Weeks 2/3 mean difference [95% CI]: - 0.09 [- 0.13, - 0.06]/ - 0.10 [- 0.14, - 0.06]; 4.3%/4.7% difference); overall TPI score (Weeks 2/3 mean difference [95% CI]: - 0.45 [- 0.55, - 0.35/ - 0.42 [- 0.53, - 0.30] difference; 16.0%/15.1% difference) and interproximal TPI score (Weeks 2/3 mean difference [95% CI]: - 0.42 [- 0.52, - 0.30]/ - 0.41 [- 0.52, - 0.29]; 14.6%/14.1% difference). Both toothpastes were generally well tolerated.ConclusionThree weeks' twice-daily brushing with the 0.454% w/w stannous fluoride Test toothpaste compared to the Control toothpaste led to statistically significant lower gingival bleeding, gingival inflammation and plaque levels in adults with mild-moderate gingivitis. These results indicate that plaque and gingivitis-reducing benefits of 0.454% w/w stannous fluoride may be seen from 2 weeks' use. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04050722; 08/08/2019.

Dataset Information

Is it necessary for children to receive professional fluoride in addition to regular fluoride toothpaste? Protocol for a systematic review.

Publications

Is it necessary for children to receive professional fluoride in addition to regular fluoride toothpaste? Protocol for a systematic review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets