Dataset Information

New insights of the correlation between AXIN2 polymorphism and cancer risk and susceptibility: evidence from 72 studies.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Numerous studies have reported the correlation between AXIN2 polymorphism and cancer risk, but the results seem not consistent. In order to get an overall, accurate and updated results about AXIN2 polymorphism and cancer risk, we conducted this study.

Methods

An updated analysis was performed to analyze the correlation between AXIN2 polymorphisms and cancer risk. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis was also used to show the associations.

Results

Seventy-two case-control studies were involved in the study, including 22,087 cases and 18,846 controls. The overall results showed rs11079571 had significant association with cancer risk (allele contrast model: OR = 0.539, 95%CI = 0.478-0.609, PAdjust = 0.025; homozygote model: OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.164-0.295, PAdjust< 0.001; heterozygote model: OR = 0.292, 95% CI = 0.216-0.394, PAdjust< 0.001; dominant model: OR = 0.249, 95% CI = 0.189-0.33, PAdjust< 0.001). The same results were obtained with rs1133683 in homozygote and recessive models (PAdjust< 0.05), and in rs35285779 in heterozygote and dominant models (PAdjust< 0.05). LD analysis revealed significant correlation between rs7210356 and rs9915936 in the populations of CEU, CHB&CHS, ESN and JPT (CEU: r² = 0.91; CHB&CHS: r² = 0.74; ESN: r² = 0.62, JPT: r² = 0.57), and a significant correlation between rs9915936 and rs7224837 in the populations of CHB&CHS, ESN and JPT (r²>0.5), between rs7224837 and rs7210356 in the populations of CEU, CHB&CHS, JPT (r²>0.5), between rs35435678 and rs35285779 in the populations of CEU, CHB&CHS and JPT (r²>0.5).

Conclusions

AXIN2 rs11079571, rs1133683 and rs35285779 polymorphisms have significant correlations with overall cancer risk. What's more, two or more polymorphisms such as rs7210356 and rs9915936, rs9915936 and rs7224837, rs7224837 and rs7210356, rs35435678 and rs35285779 have significant correlation with cancer susceptibility in different populations.

SUBMITTER: Li X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8017882 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivePrevious studies have reported an association between cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) polymorphism and gastric cancer (GC) susceptibility, but their results are controversial. This meta-analysis was intended to evaluate the relationship between the COX-2 rs20417 polymorphism and GC susceptibility in different ethnic groups.MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge, and the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) for relevant case-control studies published up to October 6, 2018, which reported an association between the COX-2 rs20417 polymorphism and gastric cancer risk. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of this association.Results15 papers detailing case-control studies were included in the analysis, which included a total of 2848 GC cases and 4962 healthy controls. The meta-analysis results indicated that the COX-2 rs20417 polymorphism was associated with increased GC susceptibility under allele (G vs C: OR = 1.67, 95%CI = 1.19-2.35, P = .003), heterozygous (GG vs CG: OR = 1.44, 95%CI = 1.03-2.02, P = .034), dominant (GC+CC vs GG: OR = 1.66, 95%CI = 1.18-2.34, P = .004), homozygous (GG vs CC:OR = 2.20, 95%CI = 1.07-4.54, P = .033), and recessive models (CC vs GG+CG:OR = 2.05, 95%CI = 1.09-3.85, P = .025). An analysis of ethnic subgroups revealed that the COX-2 rs20417 polymorphism was significantly associated with GC susceptibility in Asians under all 5 models (G vs C: OR = 2.22, 95%CI = 1.66-2.96, P < .001; GG vs CC: OR = 4.29, 95%CI = 1.94-9.50, P < .001; GG vs CG: OR = 1.86, 95%CI = 1.34-2.58, P < .001; CC vs GG+CG: OR = 3.73, 95%CI = 1.92-7.24, P < .001; GC+CC vs GG: OR = 2.20, 95%CI = 1.65-2.93, P < .001). Helicobacter pylori positive patients suffered a high risk of GC, compared to H pylori negative patients under the dominant model (OR = 3.09, 95%CI = 1.80-5.32, P < .001).ConclusionThis meta-analysis of 15 case-control studies provides strong evidence that the COX-2 rs20417 polymorphism increases the risk of GC susceptibility in general populations, especially in Asians. Helicobacter pylori positive patients and those with the COX-2 rs20417 polymorphism had a higher risk of developing GC.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:Several published studies have investigated the association between the -308G/A (rs1800629) polymorphism in the tumor necrosis factor-? (TNF-?) gene and the risk of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). However, the TNF-? gene polymorphism has a controversial role in the pathogenesis of DCM among different populations. In the present study, a meta-analysis was performed to resolve this inconsistency. METHODS:Potentially eligible papers reporting an association between the TNF-? rs1800629 polymorphism and DCM susceptibility were searched in 4 databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), and the Cochrane Library up to April 1, 2018. The odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate the strength of the associations. Subgroup analysis based on the ethnicity, studies with or without ischemic and valvular DCM was conducted. Publication bias detection was conducted using Begg test. RESULTS:Nine papers detailing case-control studies were included, reporting a total of 1339 DCM cases and 1677 healthy controls. The meta-analysis results indicated that TNF-? rs1800629 was associated with increased DCM susceptibility in the populations studied under the heterozygous model (AG vs GG: OR?=?1.91, 95% CI?=?1.05-3.50, P?=?.035) and dominant model (AG?+?AA vs GG: OR?=?1.87, 95% CI?=?1.01-3.45, P?=?.046). In the subgroup analysis for ethnicity, rs1800629 polymorphism was significantly associated with the susceptibility of DCM for Asians under the 5 models (A vs G: OR?=?2.87, 95% CI?=?1.56-5.30, P?=?.001; AA vs GG: OR?=?3.95, 95% CI?=?1.13-13.82, P?=?0.031; AG vs GG: OR?=?3.8, 95% CI?=?1.57-9.19, P?=?.003; AA vs GG?+?AG: OR?=?2.51, 95% CI?=?1.41-4.49, P?=?.002; AG?+?AA vs GG: OR?=?3.77, 95% CI?=?1.54-9.20, P?=?.004). CONCLUSION:There may be a moderate association between TNF-? rs1800629 polymorphism and DCM susceptibility in the whole populations studied; however, TNF-? rs1800629 polymorphism was significantly associated with the susceptibility of DCM for Asians, which indicates that such associations may be different between ethnicities.

Project description:To investigate the association between the susceptibility to cervical cancer and the single nucleotide polymorphisms of 5 tumor necrosis factor-? promoter genes (rs361525, rs1800629, rs1800750, rs1799964, and rs673) in Chinese women. A total of 946 peripheral blood samples were collected from women of Han Ethnicity in Shandong province. Of them, 452 were diagnosed with cervical squamous cell carcinomas. The study also included a control group of 494 healthy women. The targeted single nucleotide polymorphisms were analyzed by TaqMan probe method. (1) The rate of high-risk subtype human papillomavirus infection in exfoliated cervical epithelial cells was significantly higher in patients with cervical cancer than the control group (91.4% vs 10.3%, P < .01). The rate of human papillomavirus infection was lower in patients with carcinoma in situ than those with invasive carcinoma (77.9% vs 95.4%, P < .01). (2) There was a significant difference for rs361525 genotype (CC/CT/TT) between the control, carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma groups ( P < .001). Both rs1800629 and rs1799964 genotypes (both GG/GA/AA) were also different between these groups ( P < .001 and P < .001). (3) The allele frequencies of rs361525, rs1800629, and rs1799964 were significantly correlated with the diagnosis of cervical cancer. The frequency of T allele in rs361525 was significantly higher for cervical cancer group (10.8%) than control group (3.8%; odds ratio = 3.04, 95% confidence interval = 1.76-5.25, P < .01). The frequency of A allele in rs1800629 was significantly higher for cervical cancer (29.9%) than control group (14.2%; odds ratio = 2.58, 95% confidence interval = 1.87-3.56, P < .01). The frequency of A allele in rs1799964 was also higher for cervical cancer group (38.3%) than control group (16.4%; odds ratio = 1.43, 95% confidence interval = 1.07-1.91, P < .05). The rs361525, rs1800629, and rs17999645 were significantly correlated with the diagnosis of cervical cancer.