Dataset Information

A Nomogram for Predicting Multiple Metastases in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Large Population-Based Study.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

The present study aims to discover the risk factors of multiple metastases and develop a functional nomogram to forecast multiple metastases in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.

Methods

mCRC cases were retrospectively collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2016. Survival times between multiple metastases and single metastasis were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests. Risk factors for multiple metastases were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and a nomogram was developed to forecast the probability of multiple metastases in mCRC patients. We assessed the nomogram performance in terms of discrimination and calibration, including concordance index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA). Bootstrap resampling was used as an internal verification method, and at the same time we select external data from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University as independent validation sets.

Results

A total of 5,302 cases were included in this study as training group, while 120 cases were as validation group. The patients with single metastasis and multiple metastases were 3,531 and 1,771, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with multiple metastases or single metastasis were 19 vs. 31 months, and 20 vs. 33 months, respectively. Based on the univariate and multivariate analyses, clinicopathological characteristics were associated with number of metastasis and were used to establish nomograms to predict the risk of multiple metastases. The C-indexes and AUC for the forecast of multiple metastases were 0.715 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.707-0.723), which showed the nomogram had good discrimination and calibration curves of the nomogram showed no significant bias from the reference line, indicating a good degree of calibration. In the validation group, the AUC was 0.734 (95% CI, 0.653-0.834), and calibration curve also showed no significant bias, indicating the favorable effects of our nomogram.

Conclusions

We developed a new nomogram to predict the risk of multiple metastases. The nomogram shows the good prediction effect and can provide assistance for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

SUBMITTER: Ge Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8155489 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAlthough some studies have explored prognostic factors of myxofibrosarcoma (MFS), the sample sizes were small, generally fewer than 100 patients. There is still no effective prognostic model for MFS patients based on a large population and comprehensive factors. The present study was designed to establish and validate a large population-based, clinically relevant prognostic nomogram for predicting 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) in patients with MFS.MethodsWe identified patients with MFS (ICD-O-3 code: 8811/3) who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and separated them into training and validation cohorts (7:3 ratio). Survival was described using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors of survival. An individual nomogram was established to predict OS at 3 and 5 years in MFS patients. The discriminative ability and predictive accuracy of the nomogram were compared to those of the traditional American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in the training and validation cohorts. Finally, MFS patients were divided into two subgroups based on the prognostic index (PI) score of the nomogram, and the survival outcomes of the subgroups were compared.ResultsA total of 1,270 patients were included. Age at diagnosis, total number of in situ or malignant tumors, tumor size, tumor site, tumor extension, AJCC stage, surgical status, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were the independent predictors of survival and were included in the nomogram. The nomogram had C-indexes of 0.806 in the training cohort and 0.783 in the validation cohort, which were greater than those of the sixth edition of the AJCC staging system (training cohort, 0.669 and validation cohort, 0.674). Decision curve analysis (DCA) revealed that the nomogram was useful with high clinical net benefits. Survival outcomes were significantly different between the different risk subgroups (P<0.001).ConclusionsA novel nomogram based on a large population was constructed to evaluate survival outcomes for MFS. Its predictive efficacy was markedly superior than that of the traditional sixth edition of the AJCC staging system.

Project description:BackgroundThe optimal tool for predicting the survival of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with lung metastases remains controversial.MethodsWe selected patients diagnosed with RCC and lung metastases, from 2010 to 2015, from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. After the selection of inclusion criteria and exclusion criterion, the rest of the patients were incorporated into model analysis. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to select the most important features for construction of a nomogram predicting cancer-specific survival. A calibration plot and the concordance index (C-index) were used to estimate nomogram efficacy in a validation cohort. The association between important factors selected by LASSO regression, and prognosis was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curve. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to compare sensitivity and specificity between the nomogram we built and the TNM stage-based model.ResultsA total of 1,369 patients met the inclusion criteria, but not the exclusion criteria. The LASSO regression model reduced 15 features to seven potential predictors of survival, including tumor grade, the extent of surgery, N and T status, histological profile, and brain and bone metastasis status. Such features had good discrimination in the KM survival curves. The nomogram showed excellent discriminatory power (C-index, 0.71; 95% confidence interval: 0.70 to 0.72) and good calibration in terms of both 1- and 2-year cancer-specific survival. The nomogram showed great discriminatory power (C-index 0.68) and adequate calibration when applied to the validation cohort. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of nomogram were 0.767 and 0.780, respectively, and the AUCs of TNM stage were 0.617 and 0.618 at 1 and 2 years, respectively.ConclusionsOur nomogram might play a major role in predicting the cancer-specific survival of RCC patients with lung metastases.

Project description:ObjectivesThe Immunoscore can categorize patients into high- and low-risk groups for prognostication in colorectal cancer (CRC). Collagen plays an important role in immunomodulatory functions in the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, the correlation between collagen and the Immunoscore in the TME is unclear. This study aimed to construct a collagen signature to illuminate the relationship between collagen structure and Immunoscore.MethodsA total of 327 consecutive patients with stage I-III stage CRC were included in a training cohort. The fully quantitative collagen features were extracted at the tumor center and invasive margin of the specimens using multiphoton imaging. LASSO regression was applied to construct the collagen signature. The association of the collagen signature with Immunoscore was assessed. A collagen nomogram was developed by incorporating the collagen signature and clinicopathological predictors after multivariable logistic regression. The performance of the collagen nomogram was evaluated via calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness and then tested in an independent validation cohort. The prognostic values of the collagen nomogram were assessed using Cox regression and the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsThe collagen signature was constructed based on 16 collagen features, which included 6 collagen features from the tumor center and 10 collagen features from the invasive margin. Patients with a high collagen signature were more likely to show a low Immunoscore (Lo IS) in both cohorts (P<0.001). A collagen nomogram integrating the collagen signature and clinicopathological predictors was developed. The collagen nomogram yielded satisfactory discrimination and calibration, with an AUC of 0.925 (95% CI: 0.895-0.956) in the training cohort and 0.911 (95% CI: 0.872-0.949) in the validation cohort. Decision curve analysis confirmed that the collagen nomogram was clinically useful. Furthermore, the collagen nomogram-predicted subgroup was significantly associated with prognosis. Moreover, patients with a low-probability Lo IS, rather than a high-probability Lo IS, could benefit from chemotherapy in high-risk stage II and stage III CRC patients.ConclusionsThe collagen signature is significantly associated with the Immunoscore in the TME, and the collagen nomogram has the potential to individualize the prediction of the Immunoscore and identify CRC patients who could benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.