Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Evaluation of Intra- and Interlaboratory Variations in SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time RT-PCR Through Nationwide Proficiency Testing.


ABSTRACT:

Objective

This study aimed to examine the intra- and interlaboratory variations of cycle threshold (Ct) values using the nationwide proficiency testing for SARS-CoV-2.

Methods

Triplicated strong-positive contrived samples duplicated weak-positive contrived samples, and 2 negative samples were transported to participating laboratories in October 2021.

Results

A total of 232 laboratories responded. All except 4 laboratories correctly answered. Six false-negative results, including 2 false-negatives with Ct values beyond the threshold and 1 clerical error, were noted from weak-positive samples. Intralaboratory variations of Ct values of weak-positive and strong-positive samples were not acceptable (Ct > 1.66) in 17 and 7 laboratories, respectively. High interlaboratory variations of Ct values (up to 7 cycles) for the 2 commonly used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reagents were observed.

Conclusion

The overall qualitative performance was acceptable; intralaboratory variation was acceptable. However, interlaboratory variations of Ct values were remarkable even when the same PCR reagents were used.

SUBMITTER: Park K 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9214160 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Evaluation of Intra- and Interlaboratory Variations in SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time RT-PCR Through Nationwide Proficiency Testing.

Park Kuenyoul K   Sung Heungsup H   Chun Sail S   Min Won-Ki WK  

Laboratory medicine 20221101 6


<h4>Objective</h4>This study aimed to examine the intra- and interlaboratory variations of cycle threshold (Ct) values using the nationwide proficiency testing for SARS-CoV-2.<h4>Methods</h4>Triplicated strong-positive contrived samples duplicated weak-positive contrived samples, and 2 negative samples were transported to participating laboratories in October 2021.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 232 laboratories responded. All except 4 laboratories correctly answered. Six false-negative results, incl  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7120059 | biostudies-literature
2018-09-01 | GSE62409 | GEO
| S-EPMC7328320 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8279358 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4590848 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2041851 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1292995 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2620608 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC2262094 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6018327 | biostudies-literature