Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Interdependence of PRC1 and PRC2 for recruitment to Polycomb Response Elements

ABSTRACT: This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.

ORGANISM(S): Drosophila melanogaster

PROVIDER: GSE83248 | GEO | 2016/09/14

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA325405

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Interdependence of PRC1 and PRC2 for recruitment to Polycomb Response Elements.

Project description:Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins are epigenetic repressors essential for control of development and cell differentiation. They form multiple complexes of which PRC1 and PRC2 are evolutionary conserved and obligatory for repression. The targeting of PRC1 and PRC2 is poorly understood and was proposed to be hierarchical and involve tri-methylation of histone H3 (H3K27me3) and/or monoubiquitylation of histone H2A (H2AK118ub). Here, we present a strict test of this hypothesis using the Drosophila model. We discover that neither H3K27me3 nor H2AK118ub is required for targeting PRC complexes to Polycomb Response Elements (PREs). We find that PRC1 can bind PREs in the absence of PRC2 but at many PREs PRC2 requires PRC1 to be targeted. We show that one role of H3K27me3 is to allow PcG complexes anchored at PREs to interact with surrounding chromatin. In contrast, the bulk of H2AK118ub is unrelated to PcG repression. These findings radically change our view of how PcG repression is targeted and suggest that PRC1 and PRC2 can communicate independently of histone modifications.

| S-EPMC5137424 | biostudies-literature

Variant PRC1 complex dependent H2A ubiquitylation drives PRC2 recruitment and polycomb domain formation

Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below. Refer to individual Series

2014-05-27 | E-GEOD-55698 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Interdependence of PRC1 and PRC2 for recruitment to Polycomb Response Elements

Project description:Interdependence of PRC1 and PRC2 for recruitment to Polycomb Response Elements

| PRJNA325405 | ENA

Variant PRC1 complex dependent H2A ubiquitylation drives PRC2 recruitment and polycomb domain formation

Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.

2014-05-27 | GSE55698 | GEO

Variant PRC1 complex-dependent H2A ubiquitylation drives PRC2 recruitment and polycomb domain formation.

Project description:Chromatin modifying activities inherent to polycomb repressive complexes PRC1 and PRC2 play an essential role in gene regulation, cellular differentiation, and development. However, the mechanisms by which these complexes recognize their target sites and function together to form repressive chromatin domains remain poorly understood. Recruitment of PRC1 to target sites has been proposed to occur through a hierarchical process, dependent on prior nucleation of PRC2 and placement of H3K27me3. Here, using a de novo targeting assay in mouse embryonic stem cells we unexpectedly discover that PRC1-dependent H2AK119ub1 leads to recruitment of PRC2 and H3K27me3 to effectively initiate a polycomb domain. This activity is restricted to variant PRC1 complexes, and genetic ablation experiments reveal that targeting of the variant PCGF1/PRC1 complex by KDM2B to CpG islands is required for normal polycomb domain formation and mouse development. These observations provide a surprising PRC1-dependent logic for PRC2 occupancy at target sites in vivo.

| S-EPMC4048464 | biostudies-literature

Variant PCGF1-PRC1 links PRC2 recruitment with induced transcriptional inactivation at target genes

Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.

2021-05-31 | GSE141488 | GEO

Molecular basis of PRC1 targeting to Polycomb response elements by PhoRC.

Project description:Polycomb group (PcG) protein complexes repress transcription by modifying target gene chromatin. In Drosophila, this repression requires association of PcG protein complexes with cis-regulatory Polycomb response elements (PREs), but the interactions permitting formation of these assemblies are poorly understood. We show that the Sfmbt subunit of the DNA-binding Pho-repressive complex (PhoRC) and the Scm subunit of the canonical Polycomb-repressive complex 1 (PRC1) directly bind each other through their SAM domains. The 1.9 Å crystal structure of the Scm-SAM:Sfmbt-SAM complex reveals the recognition mechanism and shows that Sfmbt-SAM lacks the polymerization capacity of the SAM domains of Scm and its PRC1 partner subunit, Ph. Functional analyses in Drosophila demonstrate that Sfmbt-SAM and Scm-SAM are essential for repression and that PhoRC DNA binding is critical to initiate PRC1 association with PREs. Together, this suggests that PRE-tethered Sfmbt-SAM nucleates PRC1 recruitment and that Scm-SAM/Ph-SAM-mediated polymerization then results in the formation of PRC1-compacted chromatin.

| S-EPMC4863741 | biostudies-literature

Polycomb repressive complex 1 and 2 (PRC1 and PRC2) role in controling skin pigmentation

Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.

2022-12-31 | GSE159767 | GEO

Direct Recruitment of Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) to Chromatin by Core Binding Transcription Factors

Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.

2012-02-10 | GSE33660 | GEO

Polycomb Repressive Complexes occupancy reveals PRC2- independent PRC1 critical role in the control of limb development

Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.

2024-10-21 | GSE216809 | GEO