Project description:Purpose: There is a quest for novel non-invasive diagnostic markers for the detection of breast cancer. The goal of this study is to identify circulating microRNA signatures using a cohort of Asian Chinese breast cancer patients, and to compare microRNA profiles between tumour and serum samples. Experimental design: MicroRNAs from paired breast cancer tumours, normal tissue and serum samples derived from 32 patients were comprehensively profiled using microarrays (1300 microRNAs against tumour and normal tissues) or LNA RT-PCR panels (742 microRNAs against serum samples). Serum samples from healthy individuals (n=22) were also employed as normal controls. Significant serum microRNAs, identified by logistic regression, were validated in an independent set of serum samples from patients (n=82) and healthy controls (n=53). Results: The 20 most significant microRNAs differentially expressed in breast cancer tumours included miR-21, miR-10b, and miR-145, previously shown to be dysregulated in breast cancer. Interestingly, 16 of the 20 most significant microRNAs differentially expressed in serum samples were novel. MiR-1, miR-92a, miR-133a and miR-133b were identified as the most important diagnostic markers, and were successfully validated; receiver operating characteristic curves derived from combinations of these microRNAs exhibited areas under the curves of 0.944-0.946. Only seven microRNAs were overexpressed in both tumours and serum, suggesting that microRNAs may be released into the serum selectively. Conclusion: The clinical employment of microRNA signatures as a non-invasive diagnostic strategy is promising, but should be further validated for different subtypes of breast cancers. "_A" and "_B" are two tissue sections of the same sample; "_1" and "_2" represents 2 runs of the same sample; na = not available All tissue samples were histologically confirmed by a pathologist using hematoxylin and eosin staining of cryosectioned specimens. One tumour sample was rejected due to failure to detect any tumour cells. Except for two samples (with 30% and 40% tumour cells), all tumour tissues employed had a minimum of 60% tumour cells, as estimated microscopically. Overall, the breast cancer tumour samples had an average of 71% tumour cells. The criteria for adjacent normal tissue were absence of tumour cells and presence of epithelial cells. Hence, after histological confirmation, 31 breast cancer tumours and 23 matched normal tissues were employed for microRNA extraction and profiling using microarray.
Project description:MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a class of short non-coding RNAs, often act post-transcriptionally to inhibit gene expression. We used a bead-based flow cytometric profiling method to obtain miRNA expression data for 93 primary human breast tumours, 21 cell lines and five normal breast samples. Of 309 human miRNAs assayed we identify 133 miRNAs expressed in human breast and breast tumours. We used mRNA expression profiling to classify the breast tumours into Luminal A, Luminal B, Basal-like, HER2+/ER- and Normal-like. A number of miRNAs are differentially expressed between these molecular tumour subtypes and individual miRNAs are associated with clinicopathological factors. Furthermore, we find that miRNAs could classify basal versus luminal tumour subtypes in an independent data set. Keywords = miRNA Keywords = microRNA Keywords = normal Keywords = tumour Keywords = cell line Keywords = breast Keywords = cancer Keywords: Bead-based flow cytometric profiling
Project description:MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a class of short non-coding RNAs, often act post-transcriptionally to inhibit gene expression. We used a bead-based flow cytometric profiling method to obtain miRNA expression data for 93 primary human breast tumours, 21 cell lines and five normal breast samples. Of 309 human miRNAs assayed we identify 133 miRNAs expressed in human breast and breast tumours. We used mRNA expression profiling to classify the breast tumours into Luminal A, Luminal B, Basal-like, HER2+/ER- and Normal-like. A number of miRNAs are differentially expressed between these molecular tumour subtypes and individual miRNAs are associated with clinicopathological factors. Furthermore, we find that miRNAs could classify basal versus luminal tumour subtypes in an independent data set. Keywords = miRNA Keywords = microRNA Keywords = normal Keywords = tumour Keywords = cell line Keywords = breast Keywords = cancer Keywords: Bead-based flow cytometric profiling miRNA expression data for 93 primary human breast tumours, 21 cell lines and five normal breast samples
Project description:Purpose: There is a quest for novel non-invasive diagnostic markers for the detection of breast cancer. The goal of this study is to identify circulating microRNA signatures using a cohort of Asian Chinese breast cancer patients, and to compare microRNA profiles between tumour and serum samples. Experimental design: MicroRNAs from paired breast cancer tumours, normal tissue and serum samples derived from 32 patients were comprehensively profiled using microarrays (1300 microRNAs against tumour and normal tissues) or LNA RT-PCR panels (742 microRNAs against serum samples). Serum samples from healthy individuals (n=22) were also employed as normal controls. Significant serum microRNAs, identified by logistic regression, were validated in an independent set of serum samples from patients (n=82) and healthy controls (n=53). Results: The 20 most significant microRNAs differentially expressed in breast cancer tumours included miR-21, miR-10b, and miR-145, previously shown to be dysregulated in breast cancer. Interestingly, 16 of the 20 most significant microRNAs differentially expressed in serum samples were novel. MiR-1, miR-92a, miR-133a and miR-133b were identified as the most important diagnostic markers, and were successfully validated; receiver operating characteristic curves derived from combinations of these microRNAs exhibited areas under the curves of 0.944-0.946. Only seven microRNAs were overexpressed in both tumours and serum, suggesting that microRNAs may be released into the serum selectively. Conclusion: The clinical employment of microRNA signatures as a non-invasive diagnostic strategy is promising, but should be further validated for different subtypes of breast cancers. Blood samples were collected in Becton Dickinson (Franklin Lakes, NJ) Vacutainer SST tubes. Serum was harvested by centrifugation at 2200g after allowing blood to clot for 30mins. 32 patient samples and 22 samples from healthy controls were obtained for profiling. Sera samples were stored at -80oC.
Project description:We performed gene expression profiling of 31 breast cell lines (BCL) using whole-genome DNA microarrays (Affymetrix U133+2.0) to assessed a better molecular characterization of breast cell lines in order to help discover of new markers to apply to tumour samples.
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the following subset Series: GSE22216: microRNA expression profiling of early primary breast cancer to identify prognostic markers and associated pathways GSE22219: Gene expression profiling of early primary breast cancer to identify prognostic markers and associated pathways Refer to individual Series. Supplementary file: Shows correspondence between mRNA and miRNA samples.
Project description:Accurate characterization and understanding of the breast cancer subtypes is of crucial clinical importance to the heterogeneity of this disease. Several layers of information, including immunohistochemical markers, mRNA and microRNA expression profiles, and pathway analysis have been used for such purpose in several studies. However, a comprehensively integrative approach is currently missing. This paper provides microRNA and mRNA expression profiles, characterizing four breast tumor subtypes, as defined by four immunohistochemical markers. The defined sets of features were validated in two independent data sets at multiple levels, including unsupervised clustering and supervised classification. Moreover, the gene expression signatures of the tumor subtypes were screened by in-depth analysis of 12 cancer core pathways. We successfully identified and validated a novel breast cancer subtypes gene expression signature composed of 976 mRNAs and 69 miRNAs. Luminal and non-luminal tumors are shown to significantly differ both at the mRNA and miRNA levels. HER2 positive tumors are more closely related to triple negative tumors by mRNA profiling than by miRNA expression. Closely related miRNAs sharing the same targets may exert opposite roles during tumor progression. Besides the core cancer pathways, other pathways such as those controling biomass synthesis are shown to be important to enable the core basal subtype with additional progressive nature compared with the other triple negative tumors. Some therapeutic strategies are proposed for breast cancer treatment, including the combined blockage of MAPK/ERK and PI3K/Pten signalings for tumors with poor clinical outcome, and targeting Wnt and JAK/STAT and/or Hedgehog, depending on tumor subtypes, together with conventional chemotherapy with the purpose of achieving an eradicative outcome. The pathway analysis also reveals that the clinical strategy and pivotal targets need to be tuned according to different tumor subtypes. This study is the first attempt to elucidate breast cancer subtypes by combining microRNA and mRNA expression, immunohistochemical markers, and cancer core pathways. The results can avail the functional studies of the etiology of breast cancer and translated for clinical use given their intrinsic link in terms of immunohistochemistry and survival. This submission consists of microRNA profiles of 115 breast cancer tumors of several subtypes only.
Project description:Systems-wide profiling of breast cancer has so far built on RNA and DNA analysis by microarray and sequencing techniques. Dramatic developments in proteomic technologies now enable very deep profiling of clinical samples, with high identification and quantification accuracy. We analyzed 40 estrogen receptor positive (luminal), Her2 positive and triple negative breast tumors and reached a quantitative depth of more than 10,000 proteins. Comparison to mRNA classifiers revealed multiple discrepancies between proteins and mRNA markers of breast cancer subtypes. These proteomic profiles identified functional differences between breast cancer subtypes, related to energy metabolism, cell growth, mRNA translation and cell-cell communication. Furthermore, we derived a 19-protein predictive signature, which discriminates between the breast cancer subtypes, through Support Vector Machine (SVM)-based classification and feature selection. The deep proteome profiles also revealed novel features of breast cancer subtypes, which may be the basis for future development of subtype specific therapeutics.