Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

Genetic control of yeast chromatin acetylation epi-polymorphisms

ABSTRACT: Genetic control of yeast chromatin acetylation epi-polymorphisms

ORGANISM(S): Saccharomyces cerevisiae

SUBMITTER: Gael Yvert

PROVIDER: E-MTAB-575 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Genetic modifiers of chromatin acetylation antagonize the reprogramming of epi-polymorphisms.

Abraham Anne-Laure AL Nagarajan Muniyandi M Veyrieras Jean-Baptiste JB Bottin Hélène H Steinmetz Lars M LM Yvert Gaël G

PLoS genetics 20120920 9

Natural populations are known to differ not only in DNA but also in their chromatin-associated epigenetic marks. When such inter-individual epigenomic differences (or "epi-polymorphisms") are observed, their stability is usually not known: they may or may not be reprogrammed over time or upon environmental changes. In addition, their origin may be purely epigenetic, or they may result from regulatory variation encoded in the DNA. Studying epi-polymorphisms requires, therefore, an assessment of t ...[more]

PMID: 23028365

Similar Datasets

Project description:Packaging of eukaryotic genomes into chromatin has wide-ranging effects on gene transcription. Curiously, it is commonly observed that deletion of a global chromatin regulator affects expression of only a limited subset of genes bound to or modified by the regulator in question. However, in many single-gene studies it has become clear that chromatin regulators often do not affect steady-state transcription, but instead are required for normal transcriptional reprogramming by environmental cues. We therefore have systematically investigated the effects of 83 histone mutants, and 119 deletion mutants, on induction/repression dynamics of 200 transcripts in response to diamide stress in yeast. Importantly, we find that chromatin regulators play far more pronounced roles during gene induction/repression than they do in steady-state expression. Furthermore, by jointly analyzing the substrates (histone mutants) and enzymes (chromatin modifier deletions) we identify specific interactions between histone modifications and their regulators. Combining these functional results with genome-wide mapping of several histone marks in the same time course, we systematically investigated the correspondence between histone modification occurrence and function. We follow up on one pathway, finding that Set1-dependent H3K4 methylation primarily acts as a gene repressor during diamide stress, specifically at genes involved in ribosome biosynthesis. Set1-dependent repression of ribosomal genes occurs via distinct pathways for ribosomal protein genes and ribosomal biogenesis genes, which can be separated based on genetic requirements for repression and based on chromatin changes during gene repression. Together, our dynamic studies provide a rich resource for investigating chromatin regulation, and show that the M-bM-^@M-^\activatingM-bM-^@M-^] mark H3K4me3 functions largely as a repressor in yeast. We set to track how histone modifications change during transcriptional reprogramming. We perfomed a time course experiment following treatment of mid-log growing yeast (BY4741) with diamide. Samples were collected at t=0,4,8,15,30,60 and fixed by crosslinking. We extracted mononucleosomes by MNase digestion and then applied ChIP for selected histone modifications. The IPed material was hybridized to genomic tiling arrays against the input material.

Project description:Human epidemiologic and animal model data indicate that early environmental influences can persistently alter an individual’s risk of obesity. Environmental effects on hypothalamic developmental epigenetics provide a strong candidate mechanism to explain such ‘developmental programming’ of obesity. To advance our understanding of these processes, it is essential to determine to what extent the diversity of hypothalamic cell types is regulated by epigenetic differences, and when these are established. By performing genome-scale DNA methylation profiling in hypothalamic neurons and non-neuronal cells at postnatal day 0 (P0) and P21, we found that most of the DNA methylation differences distinguishing these two cell types are established postnatally. We found dramatic neuron-specific increases in DNA methylation from P0 to P21. Gene ontology analyses indicated that cell-type specific P0 to P21 methylation changes are key regulators of hypothalamic development. Quantitative bisulfite pyrosequencing verified our methylation profiling results in 16 of 16 selected regions. Expression differences were associated with DNA methylation in several genes analyzed. Our data indicate that future studies of hypothalamic epigenetics in developmental programming of obesity will gain far greater sensitivity and insight by examining outcomes at the cell-type specific level. Moreover, our results provide new evidence that early postnatal life is a critical period for murine hypothalamic developmental epigenetics. Hypothalami were dissected from inbred male C57 mice at postnatal day 0 (P0) and P21. Non-neuronal and neuronal nuclei were separated via fluorescence-activated sorting based on staining for the neuron-specific nuclear surface marker NeuN; each sample for sorting was comprised of 2 age-matched hypothalami. Genome-scale DNA methylation profiling was performed by methylation specific amplification coupled with next generation sequencing (MSA-seq) as decribed below (5 independent samples per age).

Dataset Information

Genetic control of yeast chromatin acetylation epi-polymorphisms

Publications

Genetic modifiers of chromatin acetylation antagonize the reprogramming of epi-polymorphisms.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets