Dataset Information

Limited agreement of independent RNAi screens for virus-required host genes owes more to false-negative than false-positive factors.

ABSTRACT: Systematic, genome-wide RNA interference (RNAi) analysis is a powerful approach to identify gene functions that support or modulate selected biological processes. An emerging challenge shared with some other genome-wide approaches is that independent RNAi studies often show limited agreement in their lists of implicated genes. To better understand this, we analyzed four genome-wide RNAi studies that identified host genes involved in influenza virus replication. These studies collectively identified and validated the roles of 614 cell genes, but pair-wise overlap among the four gene lists was only 3% to 15% (average 6.7%). However, a number of functional categories were overrepresented in multiple studies. The pair-wise overlap of these enriched-category lists was high, ?19%, implying more agreement among studies than apparent at the gene level. Probing this further, we found that the gene lists implicated by independent studies were highly connected in interacting networks by independent functional measures such as protein-protein interactions, at rates significantly higher than predicted by chance. We also developed a general, model-based approach to gauge the effects of false-positive and false-negative factors and to estimate, from a limited number of studies, the total number of genes involved in a process. For influenza virus replication, this novel statistical approach estimates the total number of cell genes involved to be ?2,800. This and multiple other aspects of our experimental and computational results imply that, when following good quality control practices, the low overlap between studies is primarily due to false negatives rather than false-positive gene identifications. These results and methods have implications for and applications to multiple forms of genome-wide analysis.

SUBMITTER: Hao L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3777922 | biostudies-literature | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Limited agreement of independent RNAi screens for virus-required host genes owes more to false-negative than false-positive factors.

Hao Linhui L He Qiuling Q Wang Zhishi Z Craven Mark M Newton Michael A MA Ahlquist Paul P

PLoS computational biology 20130919 9

Systematic, genome-wide RNA interference (RNAi) analysis is a powerful approach to identify gene functions that support or modulate selected biological processes. An emerging challenge shared with some other genome-wide approaches is that independent RNAi studies often show limited agreement in their lists of implicated genes. To better understand this, we analyzed four genome-wide RNAi studies that identified host genes involved in influenza virus replication. These studies collectively identif ...[more]

PMID: 24068911

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objectives: With the worldwide spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), various antibody detection kits have been developed to test for SARS-CoV-2- specific IgG, IgM, and total antibody. However, the use of different testing methods under various heat-inactivation conditions might affect the COVID-19 detection results. Methods: Seven different antibody detection kits produced by four manufacturers for detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgG, IgM, and total antibody were tested at Wuhan Huoshenshan Hospital, China. Most of the kits used the indirect immunity, capture, and double-antigen sandwich methods. The effects of various heat-inactivation conditions on SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG, IgM, and total antibody detection were analyzed for the different test methods. Results: Using the indirect immunity method, values for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody significantly increased and those for IgM antibody decreased with increasing temperature of heat-inactivation using indirect immunity method. However, values for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and total antibody showed no change when the capture and double-antigen sandwich methods were used. The changes in IgG and IgM antibody values with the indirect immunity method indicated that heat-inactivation could affect COVID-19 detection results obtained using this method. In particular, 18 (22.2%) SARS-CoV-2 IgM positive samples were detected as negative with heat-inactivation at 65°C for 30 min, and one (25%) IgG negative sample was detected as positive after heat-inactivation at 56°C for 60 min and 60°C for 30 min. Conclusions: Heat-inactivation could increase SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody values, and decrease IgM antibody values, causing potential false-positive or false-negative results for COVID-19 antibody detection using the indirect immunity method. Thus, before conducting antibody testing, the testing platforms should be evaluated in accordance with the relevant requirements to ensure accurate COVID-19 detection results.

Project description:The massive sequencing of transposon insertion mutant libraries (Tn-Seq) represents a commonly used method to determine essential genes in bacteria. Using a hypersaturated transposon mutant library consisting of 400,096 unique Tn insertions, 523 genes were classified as essential in Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655. This provided a useful genome-wide gene essentiality landscape for rapidly identifying 233 of 301 essential genes previously validated by a knockout study. However, there was a discrepancy in essential gene sets determined by conventional gene deletion methods and Tn-Seq, although different Tn-Seq studies reported different extents of discrepancy. We have elucidated two causes of this discrepancy. First, 68 essential genes not detected by Tn-Seq contain nonessential subgenic domains that are tolerant to transposon insertion, which leads to the false assignment of an essential gene as a nonessential or dispensable gene. These genes exhibited a high level of transposon insertion in their subgenic nonessential domains. In contrast, 290 genes were additionally categorized as essential by Tn-Seq, although their knockout mutants were available. The comparative analysis of Tn-Seq and high-resolution footprinting of nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) revealed that a protein-DNA interaction hinders transposon insertion. We identified 213 false-positive genes caused by NAP-genome interactions. These two limitations have to be considered when addressing essential bacterial genes using Tn-Seq. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of high-resolution Tn-Seq with other data sets is required for a more accurate determination of essential genes in bacteria. IMPORTANCE Transposon mutagenesis is an efficient way to explore gene essentiality of a bacterial genome. However, there was a discrepancy between the essential gene set determined by transposon mutagenesis and that determined using single-gene knockout strains. In this study, we generated a hypersaturated Escherichia coli transposon mutant library comprising approximately 400,000 different mutants. Determination of transposon insertion sites using next-generation sequencing provided a high-resolution essentiality landscape of the E. coli genome. We identified false negatives of essential gene discovery due to the permissive insertion of transposons in the C-terminal region. Comparisons between the transposon insertion landscape with binding profiles of DNA-binding proteins revealed interference of nucleoid-associated proteins to transposon insertion, generating false positives of essential gene discovery. Consideration of these findings is required to avoid the misinterpretation of transposon mutagenesis results.

Dataset Information

Limited agreement of independent RNAi screens for virus-required host genes owes more to false-negative than false-positive factors.

Publications

Limited agreement of independent RNAi screens for virus-required host genes owes more to false-negative than false-positive factors.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets